Delivering smoke-free environments required the passing of legislation—this is a lengthy process.
The vast majority of people support restrictions on smoking in workplaces and other public places – including 66% of people supporting restrictions on smoking in pubs.
It must be remembered that 7 out of 10 people choose not to smoke. The government wants to take account of the choice of the majority of people who want to have clean smokefree air.
In countries where similar legislation has been introduced, support for legislation has grown after implementation – even amongst smokers.
The government believes that people should have the choice to smoke, but believes it is also right that people are both made aware of the major health risks of smoking and also provided with support to quit.
Importantly, we believe that at the same time, it is right that others should be protected from exposure to hazardous secondhand tobacco smoke. This is what we are achieving through this legislation, where smoking will be eliminated in virtually every enclosed public place and workplace in this country.
Although smoke-free legislation does include provision to make non-enclosed places smoke-free, the government has no intention to use those powers at present. That means that smoking will still be permitted outside of buildings and in other non-enclosed places.
Evidence shows that ventilation does not provide a solution to eliminating the health risks associated with secondhand smoke. We know that 85 per cent of secondhand smoke actually consists of invisible and odourless gases.
Research has shown that to remove the risks of secondhand smoke, an enclosed premises would need wind tunnel-like rates of ventilation. Imagine what that would be like at the local pub!
We also know that ventilation systems are expensive - many businesses simply couldn’t afford to fit the systems even if they were effective.
There is considerable international evidence from countries that have introduced legislation for smoke-free public places and workplaces that the impact on the hospitality industry is not detrimental.
Analysis and international experience shows that going smoke-free can actually be beneficial to the hospitality industry. We must remember that almost 80 per cent England’s population do not smoke, and this represents a very large market.
The is much evidence about the benefits to hospitality of smoke-free legislation, but after the first year of being smoke-free, New York City saw that:
There is also comparable evidence of the benefits of smoke-free legislation for the hospitality industries in other countries including Ireland, and similar evidence is emerging in Scotland since their smoke-free legislation was implemented in March this year.
Importantly, smoke-free legislation will be good for the health of hospitality workers and patrons. The British Institute of Innkeeping’s magazine recently said that:
“…we are talking about banning the use of a carcinogenic substance which in enclosed spaces kills or damages the health of passive smokers—that means licensees and bar staff and customers. This is a scientific fact, and we should bear this in mind along with the economic arguments”.
The NHS provides a wide range of excellent and easily accessible smoking cessation services includin: local NHS Stop Smoking Services, The Together Programme, the NHS Smoking Helpline on 0800 169 0169, www.gosmokefree.co.uk and Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) available on prescription.
In reviewing the evidence of the health risks from secondhand smoke, the government’s independent Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health concluded that exposure to secondhand smoke was a cause of a range of medical conditions, including:
In 2005, research published in the British Medical Journal estimated that over 600 deaths each year in the UK are due to exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace.
The World Health Organisation has classified tobacco smoke as a known human carcinogen. The US Environmental Protection Agency classified secondhand smoke as a “class A” human carcinogen - along with asbestos, arsenic, benzene and radon gas.
The evidence base that secondhand smoke harms health is substantial, and has been reviewed extensively, both in this country by the government’s independent Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health, and overseas.
The World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer’s report “Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking” published in 2004 reviewed the evidence of the health risks associated with smoking and secondhand smoke - that report is over 1,400 pages long.
The US Surgeon General published a 700 page report in June this year that examined a great deal of evidence and found that even brief secondhand smoke exposure can cause immediate harm. The report says the only way to protect non-smokers from the dangerous chemicals in secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors and that exposure of adults to secondhand smoke has immediate adverse effects on the cardiovascular system and causes coronary heart disease and lung cancer. The Surgeon General said on the publication of the report that:
“The scientific evidence is now indisputable: secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death”.
Across the world, as the evidence of the risks associated with secondhand smoke exposure has accumulated, action has been taken to reduce people’s exposure to secondhand smoke.
Ireland (2004), Norway (2004), Scotland (2005), New Zealand (2004), various Canadian territories and Singapore are examples of countries which have introduced comprehensive smoke-free legislation. More recently Scotland and Wales have introduced the legislation successfully.
In America, California has had a state-wide smoke-free public places since 1998 and New York City passed smoke-free legislation in 2003. In total, over nine US states have smoke-free legislation that required completely smoke-free restaurants and bars.
This legislation has proved to be effective in protecting people from the health risks of secondhand smoke. The Journal of the American Medical Association documented a significant improvement in respiratory health among bartenders after the passage of the Californian smoke-free workplace legislation.
According to the British Medical Journal, the US state of Montana saw a 40 per cent drop in hospital admissions for heart attacks during a 6 month period of smoke-free workplaces.
The smoke-free provisions of this Act are consistent with what many other governments are doing to protect people from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke. Smokefree legislation is proving to be not only very effective in protecting health, but is also very popular.
No private domestic residence will be required to be smokefree, unless part of the residence is used for work purposes by more than one person.
It depends. Any part of a private dwelling that is used solely as a place of work may be required to be smoke-free if it is used by more than one person who does not live there, or if members of the public can actually come into that part of the dwelling in the course of work. The situation is set out in much more detail in the legislation.
The Health Act allows regulations to be made that designate additional smokefree places which are not covered by Clause 2 where people are at risk of being exposed to significant quantities of secondhand smoke. This might include sports stadia or other non-enclosed places, but it is a decision for the future, and only after the government consults the public.
The Health Actl will require enclosed or substantially enclosed public places and workplaces to be smokefree. The Health Act includes powers for other places to be required to be smokefree, but the government has no plans to make anywhere smoke-free at the present time.
We are working closely with the businesses and our colleagues in local government and in DEFRA to consider the issues of litter in outdoor areas. Nevertheless, international experience has been that this matter can be managed effectively.
Pubs and bars will not be obliged to provide outdoor areas for smoking. If they do want to open one, they will need to obtain necessary planning permissions. We would not expect that neighbours should not have to put up with high noise levels from drinkers now, or once smokefree legislation has come into force.
Furthermore some premises will need to have variations to their premises licenses approved before customers are allowed to use outdoor areas after certain hours.
No. All enclosed workplaces and public places, including restaurants, pubs, schools, public transport and membership clubs will be required to be completely smokefree once the legislation is in force. There will be limited exemptions from smokefree legislation, mainly for premises that act as an individual’s dwelling, or are clearly a private space. These exemptions are set out in the guidance from www.smokefreeengland.co.uk
The provisions made under the Health Actl only pertain to enclosed and substantially enclosed workplaces and public places. Employers and business owners will need to consider issues as they arise and seek the most appropriate action to ensure they act within the spirit of the law.
The Choosing Health White Paper made a commitment that special arrangements would be needed for certain workplaces when considering legislation. These workplaces were places such as hospices, prisons, and long-stay residential care establishments, which are also places of residence. We can see good reason for treating these workplaces differently to recognise the human rights of those people that call such places home.
[See answer to previous question.]
The consultation sets out requirements for rooms in premises where people can smoke, which will protect against drift of secondhand smoke into other areas of the premises. This includes the requirement for closing doors to the room.
While smoke-free legislation will not guarantee that people will get a smoke-free hotel room, the regulations require that hotel proprietors must designate in writing which rooms are not smoke-free and ensure that hotel rooms for smoking are clearly signed.
As the popularity of non-smoking hotels rooms is high, we are sure that people will not have too much trouble finding smoke-free hotel accommodation.
The proposed regulations will not require that, but home visitors can always ask a resident not to smoke during home visits. A standard letter has been produced that can be sent to clients.
All enclosed and substantially enclosed public places and workplaces will be required to be smoke-free.
It is our intention that the regulations make clear what is meant by an “enclosed” and “substantially enclosed” premises, and what is not. We are proposing following the definitions that are within Scotland’s smokefree legislation, so we can create a consistency in this respect, which should help business.
Not only are we making clear in regulations what we mean by enclosed and substantially enclosed, but we will also make it clear in guidance that we will publish once regulations have been formally laid.
No. Under the regulations, all vehicles used for public transport will be required to be smoke-free at all times. This means that a member of the public will know that whenever they use public transport of whatever type, it will be free from hazardous secondhand smoke.
Where a vehicle is used as a workplace by more than one person, regardless of whether they are in the vehicle at the same time, it will be required to be smokefree at all times. This protects shift and other workers who use the same vehicle from the health risks associated with secondhand smoke.
Smoking will, however, be permitted in vehicles that are for the sole use of the driver and are not used as a workplace by anyone else, either as a driver or passenger.
The smokefree legislation does not extend to privately owned vehicles.
This would depend on whether the platform was substantially enclosed or not.
Those with responsibility for the train station will be expected to ensure that appropriate signage is in place, so travellers can be sure where they can and cannot smoke.
This legislation has been developed to protect both smokers and non-smokers from secondhand smoke.
There is no provision in smoke-free legislation for offences to result in a review of a pub’s licence. We believe the penalties described in the regulations are a sufficient deterrent, and we expect that pubs and other hospitality venues will want to comply with the legislation to make their premises a better and more healthy place to visit and work.
Enforcement will be a matter for local authorities, who will appoint their enforcement officers. In England, we envisage that this would likely be local environmental health officers, but local authorities may wish to appoint other officers, including for example, trading standards or local enforcement officers.
Nevertheless, we know from the experience of other countries that smokefree legislation is largely self-enforcing.
Yes. Further details will be made public in due course.
In such situations, management should follow their standard procedures as they would in other situations where a customer was behaving in an unacceptable and uncooperative manner. There is a standard procedure on www.smokefreeengland.co.uk
To ensure consistency of enforcement across England. Local authorities are also responsible for enforcement in Scotland which we understand is working well.
Enforcement officers will be working closely with businesses in the lead up to implementation in order to build understanding of the requirements of the legislation and will be on-duty to ensure compliance is maintained. It is expected that the months after the ban will largely focus on educating and informing non-compliant businesses.
As set out in the Choosing Health White Paper in 2004, the Government is committed to provide adequate funding for local authorities to undertake this work, in line with the New Burdens Doctrine. The funding will arrive in due course.
Yes. All premises and vehicles that are required to be smokefree will have to display signs as set out in the consultation. Signs are available free of charge from www.smokefreeengland.co.uk
The regulations do not require signs to carry anyone’s name. However, organisations may choose to do this should they wish to. People who want to make a complaint about smoking in a smoke-free place should speak to the manager of the premises.
Anyone with management responsibilities for the vehicle will be required to ensure signage that meets requirements is displayed.
The Department of Health will make signage available on request and via a website in the lead up to the law coming into place, however, the onus will be on individuals with management responsibility for smoke-free premises or vehicles to ensure that signage that meets requirements is in place.
Scotland’s pre-existing signage requirements will meet the signage proposals set out in the consultation.
Guidance is being sent out by the government. However, if you have not received this guidance it is available from www.smokefreeengland.co.uk
Yes and we intend to ensure resources are available in many forms and advice is easily accessible to assist businesses to prepare for smokefree legislation .
As long as smoking shelters are not enclosed or substantially enclosed, they should be lawful. Definitions of "enclosed" and "substantially enclosed" premises can be found in the guidance. There will be no specific guidance on the requirements for smoking shelters, as premises are not legally obliged to provide these.
Telephone:
01722 434319 or 434320
email:
enhmail@salisbury.gov.uk
Postal address:
Environmental Services
Salisbury District Council
PO
Box 2126
Salisbury
SP2 2DJ